Incomplete Crimes MCQs
Incomplete Crimes MCQs
Answer these 30+ Incomplete Crimes MCQs and assess your grip on the subject of Incomplete Crimes.
Scroll below and get started!
1: Individuals who commit incomplete crimes cannot be charged with criminal wrongdoing.
A. True
B. False
2: Which of the following crimes harm society even though they may not cause direct physical harm?
A. Attempt
B. Solicitation
C. Conspiracy
D. All of these
3: Under early ______ common law, attempt was not punished as a crime.
A. Irish
B. English
C. American
D. Danish
4: Specific intent is only required for attempt.
A. True
B. False
5: Which of the following cases addresses the distinction between actions that constitute mere preparation and those that amount to substantial steps toward a completed crime?
A. People v. Paluch (1966)
B. Rex v. Scofield (1784)
C. Rex v. Higgins (1801)
D. State v. Smith (2004)
6: A ______ is a clear, definitive action toward the successful commission of a crime.
A. Last act
B. Overt act
C. Substantial step
7: Mere preparation refers to the minimal, preliminary steps that are taken to engage in crime.
A. True
B. False
8: In most jurisdictions, if the target offense is a felony, the attempt to commit the crime is considered
A. An infraction.
B. A misdemeanor.
C. A felony.
D. Crime where there will be no charge.
9: In ______ of states, a conviction for attempt requires proof that the offender had the specific intent to commit the crime.
A. 25%
B. 50%
C. 70%
D. 100%
10: Abandonment is a defense available to someone who has been charged with an incomplete crime.
A. True
B. False
11: Which of the following cases offers an example of an abandonment defense?
A. People v. Rizzo (1927)
B. State v. Smith (2004)
C. Commonwealth v. McCloskey (1975)
D. State v. Dlugash (1977)
12: Impossibility may be a defense to an attempt crime.
A. True
B. False
13: Which of the following addressed the impossibility defense?
A. State v. Smith (2004)
B. Commonwealth v. McCloskey (1975)
C. State v. Dlugash (1977)
D. State v. Lee (1991)
14: Solicitation involves only one actor.
A. True
B. False
15: A defendant charged with criminal solicitation could not argue a defense of abandonment or renunciation.
A. True
B. False
16: An example of a wheel conspiracy is a drug trafficking ring.
A. True
B. False
17: Attempt is the most controversial of the inchoate crimes.
A. True
B. False
18: Complex inchoate crimes do not have a target offense.
A. True
B. False
19: Is abandonment a defense to attempt and solicitation, both incomplete offenses. Involves a complete and voluntary renunciation and withdrawal from the crime?
A. True
B. False
20: _____ is an inchoate offense that requires specific intent to commit a crime and overt steps toward carrying out the crime.
A. All of these
B. Attempt
C. Breach of peace
D. Law against noise
21: _____ is defined as an inchoate offense involving an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime. Some state laws require an agreement and an overt action taken toward commission of the crime.
A. Capital punishment
B. Proximate cause theory of felony murder
C. All of these
D. Conspiracy
22: _____ is known as one of several tests used to determine whether the actions a person has taken towards committing a crime are punishable as an attempt crime. Using this high threshold would mean conviction only in cases where the potential offender had almost completed the target offense.
A. Dangerous proximity to success
B. Arson.
C. None of these
D. Murder.
23: Is factual impossibility a typically unsuccessful defense to the inchoate crimes of attempt, solicitation, and conspiracy. Defense arises in instances where a defendant did all he could to carry out a crime but for reasons beyond his control (e.g., the person he plans to rob moved out of state), the crime could not be completed. Because the crime would have been successful if the circumstances had been as the defendant believed them to be, the law does not allow him to benefit from the “impossibility” he was unaware of?
A. False
B. True
24: _____ is when a person takes a step toward committing crime but the crime is not completed, he may still be held criminally liable.
A. Sodomy
B. All of these
C. Incomplete crime
D. Bigamy
25: _____ is defined as a defense offered by a defendant who has been charged with an inchoate offense, such as attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy.
A. All of these
B. Legal impossibility
C. Conspiracy
D. Writing
26: _____ is known as test used to determine whether a person’s actions meet the actus reus requirement for the crime of attempt. “Mere preparation” is insufficient for an attempt conviction.
A. Knowing
B. All of these
C. Mere preparation
D. Grading
27: Is merger doctrine when two or more incomplete crimes are committed, the less-serious offense may merge into the more serious offense. For instance, solicitation merges with attempt. When a person completes the target crime, the attempt merges with the completed offense and he can only be convicted of the completed offense or attempt?
A. True
B. False
28: _____ is action taken by someone who plans to commit a crime, such as a person who drives to the bank he intends to rob. An overt act is required for some inchoate offenses, such as attempt and conspiracy.
A. Felony murder
B. Fourth Amendment
C. Overt act
D. All of these
29: _____ is defined as a defense to an incomplete crime, such as attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy.
A. Renunciation
B. None of these
C. Subjective trickery defense
D. Objective test for entrapment
30: _____ is known as inchoate offense, encouraging another person to engage in a criminal act.
A. Following another individual
B. None of these
C. Solicitation
D. Creating the apprehension that a family member will be placed in immediate or future bodily harm
31: Is stalking public order offense involves tracking a person’s movements with intent to harass or cause harm?
A. False
B. True
32: _____ is test to determine whether a defendant’s actions satisfy the actus reus requirement for attempt.
A. All of these
B. Multiple
C. Substantial step
D. Interstate Commerce Clause
33: _____ is defined as the crime an offender takes steps toward committing and intends to carry out.
A. None of these
B. Target offense
C. Uttering
D. Castle doctrine
34: _____ is known as an inchoate offense that involves promises to harm, injure, or kill with intent to place victim in fear.
A. Threats
B. All of these
C. Intervention in defense of others
D. Knowledge of the wrongfulness of the child’s actions
List of Incomplete Crimes MCQs...
Available in:
Incomplete Crimes MCQs
