Our experts have gathered these Witnesses MCQs through research, and we hope that you will be able to see how much knowledge base you have for the subject of Witnesses by answering these 20+ multiple-choice questions.
Get started now by scrolling down!
A. Yes, after a showing of good cause
B. Yes, after corroborating evidence
C. No, a witness may be prevented from testifying absent an oath or affirmation
D. No, unless the jury chooses to do so
A. True
B. False
A. No, any individual who is capable of recalling events is competent to be a witness.
B. No, absent a psychiatric report to the contrary.
C. Yes, but the presumption may be rebutte
D. It depends on the age of the witness and the amount of time spent in treatment.
A. True
B. False
A. Yes, crimes of witnesses cannot be used for impeachment.
B. No, all crimes may be used for impeachment purposes.
C. No, convictions of any crimes involving dishonesty can be used for impeachment.
D. No, convictions may only be used if punishable by more than 1 year in prison.
A. True
B. False
A. True
B. False
A. True
B. False
A. Restoring a witness’s character for truthfulness through character evidence
B. Restoring a witness’s credibility through a prior consistent statement
C. Restoring a witness’s character for sobriety through the admission of rehabilitation documentation
D. A and c
E. A and b
A. True
B. False
A. True
B. False
A. Only if the judge deems it necessary
B. Yes
C. No
D. Only if the opposing party requests its admission
A. The document has been independently authenticate
B. The witness has incomplete memory of events.
C. The document is presented into court and to the opposing lawyer.
D. The document is shown to the witness.
E. The witness puts the document aside after looking it over and testifies without reading directly from the document.
A. Both are read out loud
B. Both are used when a witness cannot recall details
C. Both may be introduced into evidence by the adverse party
D. A and c
A. Yes, unless it’s a jurisdiction that requires that the witness prepared the document.
B. Yes, so long as she read the document when fresh in her memory and found the text correct,
C. Yes, so long as she adopted the document as an accurate record of events.
D. All of the above
A. None of these
B. Actual seizure
C. Reasonable seizure
D. competency to testify
A. Religious practices
B. corroboration
C. All of these
D. Knowledge of hurricanes in a hurricane plagued area
A. False
B. True
A. Yes, because the police set up the interrogation with the informant.
B. past recollection recorded
C. No, because he was not confronted with the coercion of police interrogation.
D. All of these
A. All of these
B. Constitutional rights
C. Judicial integrity
D. present recollection refreshed
A. spousal competence
B. No, unless he can also be qualified as an expert in securities
C. All of these
D. narrative question