Constitutional Violations MCQs
Constitutional Violations MCQs
Welcome to MCQss.com's page dedicated to Constitutional Violations MCQs. This page provides a variety of multiple-choice questions related to constitutional violations. Each question is designed to test your understanding of constitutional law and the various violations that can occur.
Constitutional violations refer to the infringement of individual rights or the disregard of constitutional principles and protections. These violations can occur in various contexts, such as law enforcement practices, government actions, or restrictions on freedom of speech, among others.
By practicing the Constitutional Violations MCQs on MCQss.com, you can deepen your knowledge of constitutional law and familiarize yourself with different scenarios and case studies. The interactive format allows you to assess your understanding by selecting the correct answers and receiving immediate feedback.
The benefits of using these Constitutional Violations MCQs include preparing for exams, assessments, or interviews related to constitutional law. They also serve as a valuable tool for self-assessment, helping you identify areas of strength and areas that require further study.
1: The exclusionary rule does not provide a remedy for one who is unconstitutionally arrested yet not brought to trial.
A. True
B. False
2: A police officer can be sued under § 1983 for any action taken by the officer that violates the civil rights of an individual.
A. True
B. False
3: A supervisor cannot be held liable for the actions of officers under his or her command under a § 1983 suit.
A. True
B. False
4: Prosecutors enjoy absolute immunity from § 1983 suit for much the same reasons as do judges.
A. True
B. False
5: The police have a legal obligation to intervene in all possible situations in order to protect the general public.
A. True
B. False
6: Police officers may be sued under state law for committing a tort (civil wrong) against an individual.
A. True
B. False
7: One of the requirements to hold a city government liable under § 1983 is that the government was aware of and deliberately disregarded a significant risk to the public.
A. True
B. False
8: Traditionally, judges have been disinclined to interfere in the affairs of police departments.
A. True
B. False
9: Qualified immunity allows the police to enforce the law without fear that they will be held legally liable.
A. True
B. False
10: Traditionally, police agencies have welcomed civilian review oversight.
A. True
B. False
11: An officer acting with the authority of his or her position as an officer is said to be acting ______.
A. With authority
B. With the power of the state
C. In official capacity
D. Under color of law
12: What level of immunity, if any, is afforded to witnesses from § 1983 suits?
A. Absolute immunity
B. Qualified immunity
C. Limited immunity
D. Unlimited immunity
13: What level of immunity, if any, is afforded to probation officers from § 1983 suits?
A. Absolute immunity
B. Qualified immunity
C. Limited immunity
D. Unlimited immunity
14: In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court essentially expand § 1983 suits to the federal government?
A. Monroe v. Pape
B. Huffman v. County of Los Angeles
C. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
D. Chavez v. Martinez
15: ______ refer to money that pays for the actual expenses and harm suffered by the plaintiff.
A. Compensatory damages
B. Punitive damages
C. Tort fees
D. Fines
16: _____ is defined as judges, prosecutors, witnesses, and jurors may not be sued for acts undertaken as part of the judicial function.
A. None of these
B. Efficient
C. Absolute immunity
D. The best
17: _____ is known as Federal law enforcement officers and other federal employees may be sued for violating an individual’s constitutional rights or a right under federal law.
A. Bivens legal suit
B. FISA
C. All of these
D. The PATRIOT Act
18: Is blue wall of silence police refusal to testify about the unlawful conduct of other police officers?
A. False
B. True
19: _____ is civilian review boards in most large cities investigate and recommend punishments for police found to have engaged in misconduct.
A. None of these
B. Aguilar–Spinelli test
C. Reasonable suspicion
D. Civilian review
20: _____ is defined as an act under the authority of state or federal law.
A. All of these
B. Hunch
C. Color of state law
D. Preponderance of the evidence
21: _____ is known as a federal statute that authorizes an individual to sue the federal government for various torts.
A. Federal Tort Claims Act
B. Concurrent jurisdiction
C. FISA
D. None of these
22: Is injunction a judicial order directing a halt to a harmful act or policy?
A. True
B. False
23: _____ is a judicial order requiring a police department to adopt various reforms.
A. FISA
B. The PATRIOT Act
C. Pattern-or-practice decree
D. All of these
24: _____ is defined as police officers, correctional officials, and other criminal justice professionals may be sued only for violating “well-established” constitutional rights.
A. The Eighth Amendment
B. Qualified immunity
C. All of these
D. The First Amendment
25: _____ is known as false testimony by police officers.
A. Elkins v. United States
B. Weeks v. United States
C. None of these
D. Testilying
26: Is title 42, Section 1983 of the U.S. Code individuals may be sued for acting under the color of state law for violating an individual’s constitutional rights or a federal right?
A. False
B. True
27: _____ is a state court suit for damages to compensate individuals who have suffered harm.
A. Judiciousness
B. Regularity
C. Tort actions
D. None of these
List of Constitutional Violati...
Available in:
Constitutional Violations MCQs
