The Exclusionary Rule and Entrapment MCQs
The Exclusionary Rule and Entrapment MCQs
Welcome to MCQss.com's page dedicated to Exclusionary Rule and Entrapment MCQs. This page offers a range of multiple-choice questions related to the legal framework governing the exclusionary rule and entrapment defenses.
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that excludes illegally obtained evidence from being used against a defendant in criminal proceedings. Entrapment refers to situations where law enforcement induces individuals to commit crimes they would not have otherwise committed. Understanding the legal principles, procedures, and controversies surrounding the exclusionary rule and entrapment is essential for professionals in the legal field and those interested in criminal justice.
The Exclusionary Rule and Entrapment MCQs on MCQss.com provide an interactive platform to assess and expand your knowledge in this area. Each question presents a scenario, concept, or legal principle related to the exclusionary rule and entrapment. By selecting the correct answer, you can test your understanding and receive immediate feedback to reinforce your knowledge.
By practicing these MCQs, you can explore various aspects, including the purpose of the exclusionary rule, exceptions to its application, entrapment tests, the role of law enforcement, the rights of defendants, and the impact on criminal justice outcomes. These MCQs serve as a valuable resource for exam preparation, self-assessment, or deepening your understanding of the complexities involved in the exclusionary rule and entrapment defenses.
1: The Fourth Amendment is silent on the consequences of an unreasonable search and seizure.
A. True
B. False
2: The practice of state police obtaining evidence in a manner that would have been unconstitutional for federal agents, then giving said evidence to the federal agents, was known as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.
A. True
B. False
3: The exclusionary rule is a remedy created by the judiciary.
A. True
B. False
4: One argument against the exclusionary rule is that the courts make little to no distinction among honest mistakes or technical violations of the law and blatant violations of the law.
A. True
B. False
5: All defendants are eligible to contest the legality of a search.
A. True
B. False
6: Evidence seized due to an unlawful search is allowed at trial if the police were acting in good faith that their actions were in accordance with the law.
A. True
B. False
7: Research conducted indicates that approximately 10% of all felony cases are either downgraded to a misdemeanor or dropped all together due to the exclusionary rule.
A. True
B. False
8: Entrapment is an affirmative defense.
A. True
B. False
9: One common argument against allowing the entrapment defense is that certain crimes are difficult to investigate without the use of informants and/or undercover officers.
A. True
B. False
10: The subjective test for entrapment focuses on the defendant.
A. True
B. False
11: In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court first establish the exclusionary rule?
A. Elkins v. United States
B. Mapp v. Ohio
C. Weeks v. United States
D. Wolf v. Colorado
12: In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court apply the exclusionary rule to the federal government?
A. Elkins v. United States
B. Mapp v. Ohio
C. Weeks v. United States
D. Wolf v. Colorado
13: In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court extend the Fourth Amendment to the states?
A. Elkins v. United States
B. Mapp v. Ohio
C. Weeks v. United States
D. Wolf v. Colorado
14: In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court abolish the silver platter doctrine?
A. Elkins v. United States
B. Mapp v. Ohio
C. Weeks v. United States
D. Wolf v. Colorado
15: In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court apply the exclusionary rule to the states?
A. Elkins v. United States
B. Mapp v. Ohio
C. Weeks v. United States
D. Wolf v. Colorado
16: _____ is term used to describe a weak link between an unreasonable search and the resulting seizure of evidence; the exclusionary rule does not apply where evidence is attenuated.
A. Attenuated
B. None of these
C. The Miranda test
D. First impression
17: _____ is defined as permits the use of unlawfully seized evidence in proceedings that are not part of a formal trial.
A. Collateral proceedings
B. Compensatory damages
C. None of these
D. Tort fees
18: _____ is known as evidence that is discovered as a result of unlawful seizure.
A. Derivative evidence
B. Obama
C. Clinton
D. All of these
19: Is due process test for entrapment an entrapment defense that relies on the Due Process Clause’s prohibition against the government engaging in outrageous conduct that induces an individual to commit a crime?
A. True
B. False
20: _____ is situation in which the government entraps or induces an individual to commit a crime.
A. All of these
B. Eyewitness identification
C. 12
D. Entrapment
21: _____ is defined as rule that evidence that is obtained as a result of a violation of the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is inadmissible in a criminal prosecution to establish a defendant’s guilt.
A. As soon as an individual becomes the focus of an investigation
B. None of these
C. Exclusionary rule
D. Before any questions are asked of the suspect
22: _____ is known as evidence derived from unlawfully seized evidence.
A. Immediately upon arrest
B. Fruit of the poisonous tree
C. All of these
D. Common law
23: Is good faith exception an exception to the exclusion of illegally seized evidence in situations in which an officer has acted in the good faith belief that his or her conduct complies with the Fourth Amendment?
A. False
B. True
24: _____ is an error made in admission of evidence that does not contribute to the conviction obtained. An appellate court must be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the error is harmless.
A. None of these
B. A neutral and detached magistrate
C. Property and persons subject to search or seizure
D. Harmless error
25: _____ is defined as cross-examination that is intended to call into question a witness’s credibility.
A. Brief
B. Return an indictment
C. Impeachment
D. None of these
26: _____ is known as principle that provides that evidence unlawfully seized nevertheless is admissible where the police are able to demonstrate that the same evidence was also obtained through independent and lawful means.
A. None of these
B. Independent source doctrine
C. Wolf v. Colorado
D. Elkins v. United States
27: Is inevitable discovery rule rule providing that evidence seized as the result of an unconstitutional search is admissible where the government can prove that it would inevitably have been discovered in a lawful fashion?
A. False
B. True
28: _____ is Test for entrapment that focuses on the conduct of the government rather than on the character of the individual.
A. For the safety of the officer
B. Objective test for entrapment
C. Abandoned property
D. All of these
29: _____ is defined as the effect of an attenuated connection between an illegal search and evidence seized in such a search; if the connection is attenuated, it is said to purge the taint of the illegal search.
A. None of these
B. The Second Amendment
C. Purging the taint
D. The First Amendment
30: _____ is known as practice, ruled unconstitutional in 1960, in which federal officials relied on evidence in federal prosecutions that had been seized by state officials in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
A. Silver platter doctrine
B. Photographic lineups
C. Lineups
D. All of these
31: Is standing a defendant’s eligibility to contest the legality of a search?
A. True
B. False
32: _____ is test that asks whether the accused possessed the criminal intent or predisposition to commit the crime or whether the government created the crime.
A. Concurrent jurisdiction
B. Subjective test for entrapment
C. FISA
D. All of these
List of The Exclusionary Rule ...
Available in:
The Exclusionary Rule and Entrapment MCQs
