Stop and Frisk MCQs (Criminal Procedure U.S.)
Stop and Frisk MCQs (Criminal Procedure U.S.)
Welcome to MCQss.com's page dedicated to Stop and Frisk MCQs. This page features a variety of multiple-choice questions related to the legal framework governing stop and frisk encounters.
Stop and frisk is a law enforcement practice involving brief stops of individuals for investigative purposes and limited searches for weapons. Understanding the legal principles, procedures, and controversies surrounding stop and frisk encounters is crucial for professionals in law enforcement, legal fields, and those interested in criminal justice issues.
The Stop and Frisk MCQs on MCQss.com provide an interactive platform to assess and expand your knowledge in this area. Each question presents a scenario, concept, or legal principle related to stop and frisk encounters. By selecting the correct answer, you can test your understanding and receive immediate feedback to reinforce your knowledge.
By practicing these MCQs, you can explore various aspects, including the Fourth Amendment considerations, reasonable suspicion, the scope of searches during stop and frisk encounters, racial profiling concerns, the impact on individual rights, and the balance between public safety and civil liberties. These MCQs serve as a valuable resource for exam preparation, self-assessment, or deepening your understanding of the complexities involved in stop and frisk practices.
1: Police are authorized to conduct investigative stops and frisks based on reasonable suspicion.
A. True
B. False
2: Which is not a factor relied on in finding reasonable suspicion?
A. Evasion
B. Time
C. Education Level
D. Noncooperation
3: Young woman was hanging out in an area known for drug sales shortly after midnight. A patrolman drove by the corner where she was standing and caught a glimpse of her face. He believed he had picked her up in the past for drug use and sales. The patrolman drove around the block a second time, and when the woman saw him coming, she ran as fast as she could in the opposite direction. Police may have reasonable suspicion to stop the suspect.
A. True
B. Fals
4: The less reliable the informant, the more a court may insist that the informant provides detailed information.
A. True
B. False
5: Police receive an anonymous tip. The tipper’s identity is unknown and whether the informant has been reliable in the past is unknown. The informant has secondhand knowledge of the information. May this tip be relied upon?
A. Yes, but the police will likely have to corroborate the details.
B. No, anonymous tips can never be relied upon.
C. Yes, in the interest of preventing crime, any tip should always be relied upon.
D. No, unless the tipper is willing to come to the scene.
6: Profiles are very important in identifying and apprehending criminals and should always be relied upon without additional observations.
A. True
B. False
7: Samantha arrived in the United States after an international flight. She had been vacationing in a country that had been having increasing problems with drug exportation. She typically worked in her home state of New York Monday through Friday so she was only able to take short trips over the weeken The flight was 9 hours long, and she had been gone for just 48 hours total. She had no luggage at all. Samantha does not exhibit characteristics consistent with the Markonni drug courier profile.
A. True
B. False
8: A stop by police based solely on race is unconstitutional.
A. True
B. False
9: Patrick is an Irish immigrant. He recently moved to Boston. He decided to take a stroll to explore the North End to find the best Italian pastries the area had to offer. The North End is a traditional Italian neighborhoo His red curly hair made him quite noticeable on the street, and local resident called the cops in hopes they would make Patrick go back to his own neighborhood and stay out of the North En Can the police stop Patrick and make him leave?
A. Yes, he doesn’t belong in the neighborhoo
B. No, he has done nothing to give rise to reasonable suspicion.
C. Yes, he has offended the residents, which creates reasonable suspicion.
D. No, there is a 24-hour waiting perio
10: Police suspected that Logan was involved in an attempted murder. Police drove to his home and woke him up at 4 m. Without cause, he was handcuffed and placed in the patrol car and taken to police headquarters. In order for this police action to be proper, what would be required?
A. Probable cause
B. Judicial authorization
C. A and b
D. A or b
11: Courts have adopted an approach to Terry stops in which under no circumstances may the stop last for more than 20 minutes.
A. True
B. False
12: During a Terry stop, police must use the least intrusive means reasonably available to verify or dispel the officer’s suspicion in a short period of time.
A. True
B. False
13: Allen was stopped by an officer who was looking for a man who, moments earlier, fled the scene of a fight on foot. The officer asked Allen for some form of identification. Allen refused to produce any identification, and the officer arrested Allen for obstructing a police officer in discharging a legal duty. Was the arrest proper?
A. Yes, providing the state had a statute that criminalized the failure to produce identification.
B. Yes, regardless of state law.
C. No, unless the officer knew Allen was involved in the fight.
D. No, even if it was against state law to not produce identification.
14: In a Terry stop and frisk, a police officer is limited to looking only for weapons that could be used to harm himself or herself or another officer.
A. True
B. False
15: Dan was pulled over for driving 90 miles per hour in a 45 mile per hour zone. As officers approached Dan’s vehicle, he quickly got out of the car and met them outside. They asked for his license and registration, but he refused to produce the documents. Dan ignored the requests and began walking back toward the car. One officer shined his flashlight into the car and saw what appeared to be a knife in the rear deck by the back windshiel May the officer search the vehicle for weapons?
A. No, not unless Dan, the driver, committed a crime.
B. No, not unless the officer obtains a warrant.
C. Yes, providing the officer had a reasonable belief of dangerousness and the search was limited only to areas where a weapon could be hidden.
D. Yes, providing a reasonable belief of dangerousness, an officer can search the entire vehicle.
16: To conduct a stop and frisk, officers must have “probable suspicion” that such a cautious step is necessary.
A. True
B. False
17: Whether or not a stop is constitutional must be established on an individual, case-by-case basis.
A. True
B. False
18: An officer’s experience and expertise can play a crucial role in determining the constitutionality of a stop and frisk.
A. True
B. False
19: Information obtained from an informant or eyewitness is known as “secondhand information.”
A. True
B. False
20: Police may not rely on anonymous tips due to their inherent untrustworthiness.
A. True
B. False
21: Determining reasonable suspicion based on a profile has been deemed unconstitutional.
A. True
B. False
22: In both arrests and Terry stops, the suspect can be detained as long as is deemed necessary by the officers.
A. True
B. False
23: The 20-min period should not be thought of as a “bright-line” limit on Terry stops.
A. True
B. False
24: A judge may deem a stop too intrusive if police neglected a potentially less intrusive investigative method.
A. True
B. False
25: Only a few state supreme courts have held that officers need reasonable suspicion to order a driver out of a stopped vehicle.
A. True
B. False
26: Which case established the rules for a stop and frisk?
A. Henry v. United States
B. Terry v. Ohio
C. United States v. Cortez
D. Ornelas v. United States
27: What level of proof is required for a stop and frisk?
A. Hunch
B. Preponderance of the evidence
C. Reasonable suspicion
D. Probable cause
28: Frisks are conducted for what purpose?
A. To check for drugs
B. To check for contraband
C. For the safety of the officer
D. For the safety of the suspect
29: What level of proof is required for police to order the driver of a vehicle to step out?
A. Hunch
B. Preponderance of the evidence
C. Reasonable suspicion
D. Probable cause
30: Which of the following may be seized during a frisk?
A. Wedding ring
B. Cocaine
C. Cell phone
D. Wallet
31: _____ is information from an unidentified informant.
A. All of these
B. Anonymous tip
C. Showups
D. Lie detector tests
32: _____ is defined as a police officer in justifying an intrusion must present specific and articulable facts that together with rational inferences drawn from those facts reasonably suggest that an individual has committed a crime or is about to commit a crime.
A. Articulable suspicion
B. The reasonable border
C. The actual border
D. All of these
33: _____ is known as the facts of each situation are evaluated to determine whether a police officer’s conduct meets the applicable legal standard. An example is the standard for a reasonable suspicion stop in accordance with Terry v. Ohio.
A. All of these
B. Showups
C. Case-by-case determination
D. Photographic lineups
34: Is drug courier profile a profile developed based on experience that isolates characteristics of a drug trafficker?
A. False
B. True
35: _____ is a police officer may pat down a suspect’s outer clothing.
A. Self-incrimination
B. Reading of Miranda rights
C. Frisk
D. None of these
36: _____ is defined as an individual who provides information about criminal activity to law enforcement.
A. Informant
B. Fourteenth
C. All of these
D. First
37: _____ is known as a police officer who pats down a suspect’s outer clothing and feels an object whose contour or mass makes its identity immediately apparent may lawfully seize the item under the plain-feel doctrine.
A. 10
B. Plain-feel doctrine
C. All of these
D. 12
38: Is racial profiling stopping or arresting individuals because of their race, ethnicity, religion, or other characteristic rather than because of their actions?
A. False
B. True
39: Is reasonable suspicion a police officer may undertake an investigative stop of a suspect where he or she has an objective, factual basis to suspect that “crime is afoot”: the suspect has engaged in, is about to engage in, or is engaging in criminal activity. This determination is based on the totality of the circumstances, and no single fact may be determinative. Factors to consider include the suspect’s actions, nervousness, and evasiveness; frequency and type of criminal activity in the area; time of day; and the officer’s prior knowledge of the suspect?
A. True
B. False
40: _____ is the police may stop an individual in those instances in which they have a reasonable basis to believe that crime may be afoot. The police may conduct a frisk for weapons where the individual fails to dispel the officer’s fear that the individual is armed and presently dangerous.
A. A public street
B. The suspect’s car
C. Stop and frisk
D. All of these
41: _____ is defined as state laws that authorize the police to require a citizen subjected to a stop and frisk to present identification.
A. The king’s law
B. Standard law
C. Stop-and-identify statutes
D. None of these
42: _____ is known as information from an unidentified informant.
A. All of these
B. Deterrence
C. anonymous tip
D. hung jury
43: Is articulable suspicion a police officer in justifying an intrusion must present specific and articulable facts that together with rational inferences drawn from those facts reasonably suggest that an individual has committed a crime or is about to commit a crime?
A. True
B. False
44: _____ is the facts of each situation are evaluated to determine whether a police officer’s conduct meets the applicable legal standard. An example is the standard for a reasonable suspicion stop in accordance with Terry v. Ohio.
A. Police administrative procedures
B. None of these
C. fundamental fairness
D. case-by-case determination
45: _____ is defined as a profile developed based on experience that isolates characteristics of a drug trafficker.
A. No, one cotenant generally has no right to prevail over the express wishes of another.
B. Yes, the woman is always right in domestic issues.
C. drug courier profile
D. None of these
46: _____ is known as an individual who provides information about criminal authority to law enforcement.
A. abandoned property
B. All of these
C. informant
D. There is no burden of proof because the case is automatically thrown out due to police misconduct
47: Is plain-feel doctrine an exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement that allows a police officer to seize an item without a search warrant when (1) the officer is lawfully positioned and (2) there is probable cause to seize the objects?
A. True
B. False
48: _____ is stopping or arresting individuals because of their race, ethnicity, religion, or other characteristic rather than because of their activity.
A. None of the above
B. All of these
C. racial profiling
D. Clemency
49: _____ is defined as the police may stop an individual in those instances in which they have a reasonable basis to believe that crime may be afoot. The police may conduct a frisk for weapons where the individual fails to dispel the officer’s fear that the individual is armed and presently dangerous.
A. Judicial authorization
B. All of these
C. stop and frisk
D. A or b
50: _____ is known as state laws that authorize the police to require a citizen subjected to a stop and frisk to prevent identification.
A. None of these
B. stop-and-identify statutes
C. No, convictions of any crimes involving dishonesty can be used for impeachment.
D. general warrants
List of Stop and Frisk MCQs (C...
Available in:
Stop and Frisk MCQs (Criminal Procedure U.S.)
